|
Industry and science
Bero LA, Glantz S, Hong M-K. The limits of competing interest disclosures.
Tobacco
Control 2005: In Press
Bialous S, Yach D. Whose standard is it anyway? How the tobacco
industry determines the International Organization for Standardization
(ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco products. Tobacco
Control 2001;10:96-104
Bitton A, Neuman MD, Barnoya J, Glantz SA. The p53 tumor suppressor
gene and the tobacco industry: research, debate, and conflict of
interest. Lancet
2005;published online January 14
Gunja M, Wayne GF, Landman A, Connolly G, McGuire A. The case for
fire safe cigarettes made through industry documents. Tobacco
Control 2002;11:346-53
Hirschhorn N, Bialous S, Shatenstein S. Philip Morris' new scientific
initiative:
an analysis. Tobacco
Control 2001;10:247-52
Hirschhorn N. Shameful Science: four decades of the German tobacco
industry's hidden research on smoking and health. Tobacco
Control 2000;9:242-47
Ong E, Glantz S. Constructing "Sound Science" and "Good
Epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms.
American
Journal of Public Health 2001,91:1749-1757
Ong E, Glantz S. Tobacco industry efforts subverting the International
Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study. Lancet
2000;355:1253-9
Tong EK, Glantz SA. ARTIST (Asian regional tobacco industry scientist
team): Philip Morris attempt to exert a scientific and regulatory
agenda on Asia. Tobacco
Control 2004;13 (Suppl 2):ii118-ii124
Warner KE. Tobacco industry scientific advisors: serving society
or selling cigarettes? American
Journal of Public Health 1991;81:839-842
|