Home Overview Contact Us News Resources Links Tobacco Control Journal Courses
Gateway - Header
  Research
  FAQ's

Look in documents for

1 to 10 of 17
1. Title: Destruction of classified documents
Author: Thomas, AG
Organisation: British American Tobacco Company Limited
Bates: 500173752/500173752
Date: 15 December 1992
Rating:
Source: British American Tobacco (BATCo)
Page Count: 1
Type: Memorandum
Summary: Memorandum from AG Thomas (Head of Group Security, BAT Millbank) outlining the company's records management policy for the destruction of documents. [Ed: A useful generic reference for industry document destruction.]

"In Millbank 3 facilities exist for the destruction of classified, i.e. SECRET or RESTRICTED, or other sensitive documents. a) Office shredders located in departments throughout the building, b) A disintegrator located in the undercroft, c) External contract shredding through Group 4.

In determining whether a redundant document contains sensitive information holders should app...
View File

2. Title: Tobacco lawyer denies shredding claim
Author: Boyle, J.
Resource: The Australian Financial Review
Date: 15 April 2002
Rating:
Page: 3
Type: Newspaper article
Summary: A senior partner of law firm Clayton Utz denies involvement in the scandal regarding the shredding of British American Tobacco documents.
Copyright: Copyright restrictions prevent us from showing you the contents of this document.

3. Title: Cigarette giant tells workers to shred documents
Author: Bowers, S.
Resource: The Sydney Morning Herald
Date: 2 May 2002
Rating:
Page: 7
Type: Newspaper article
Summary: An internal memo from British American Tobacco reveals a policy of destroying redundant documents that may "harm or embarrass" the company.
View File

4. Title: Cancer case documents shredded
Author: Marritt, C; Towers, K
Resource: The Australian Financial Review
Date: 12 April 2002
Rating:
Page: 1
Type: Newspaper article
Summary: Evidence has been brought forward that law firm Clayton Utz and their client British American Tobacco shredded documents so that they could not be used in court against the company. As a result, a judgement has been made in favour of a woman suing BAT for being responsible for her terminal lung cancer.
Copyright: Copyright restrictions prevent us from showing you the contents of this document.

5. Title: Tobacco company shredded evidence
Author: Ross, N.
Resource: Daily Telegraph
Date: 12 April 2002
Rating:
Page: 2
Type: Newspaper article
Summary: Evidence has been brought forward that law firm Clayton Utz and their client British American Tobacco shredded documents so that they could not be used in court against the company. As a result, a judgement has been made in favour of a woman suing BAT for being responsible for her terminal lung cancer.
View File

6. Title: The United States' written direct examination of John St. Vincent Welch
Resource: United States District Court for the District of Columbia United States of America plaintiff, v. Philip Morris USA Inc f/k/a Philip Morris Inc, et al. defendants Civil Action No. 99-CV-02496 (GK)
Date: 31 January 2005
Rating:
Page Count: 30
Type: Depositions, transcripts, testimony
Summary: John St Vincent Welch was the Chief Executive Officer of the Tobacco Institute of Australia (TIA) from 21 January 1991 to the end of April 1992. The testimony addresses the document retention policy and document destruction practices at the TIA.

There are two versions of the testimony provided: 20050131a and 20050131b. The original and then an amended version respectively. The file name in the URL for the amended version indicated a date of 5 January 2002.

Extracts:
Q. You previously mentioned the TIA's Document Retention Policy. Did the TIA have a document retention policy at the star...
Files: LAW20050131a.pdf, LAW20050131b.pdf

7. Title: Court damages dwarfed by damage to reputations
Author: Cave, M; Towers, K.
Resource: The Australian Financial Review
Date: 13 April 2002
Rating:
Page: 4
Type: Newspaper article
Summary: The suppression order that prevented the document shredding by British American Tobacco has been lifted and is expected to cause a large amount of damage to the reputation of BAT.
Copyright: Copyright restrictions prevent us from showing you the contents of this document.

8. Title: Training For J Lee - Document Retention Program.
Author: Maddox, R
Bates: 682724818/682724821
Date: 10 February 1993
Rating:
Source: Brown & Williamson
Page Count: 4
Type: Memorandum
Summary: File note made by Robert L. Maddox of Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation (B&W), 10 February 1993, entitled "Training for J.W. Lee, Jr. - Document Retention Program".

B&W assigned a Mr JW Lee "to assist with the collection of sample documents and to cull any documents having possible relevance to pending or threatened litigation or government investigation." [Ed: in view of revelations on massive document shredding ... this entire document could be euphemistic for document shredding.]
View File

9. Title: [Letter to Wilson, T.I., AMATIL]
Author: Strubel, D.G.
Organisation: Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation
Bates: 501023279/501023279
Date: 22 February 1977
Rating:
Source: Brown & Williamson
Page Count: 1
Type: Letter
Summary: Letter to Tasmin Wilson, AMATIL, from Dave Strubel, Brown & Williamson Kentucky, answering a question about shredding and crimping as a method of increasing filling power.

View File

10. Title: Records Administration Research & Development Department
Organisation: Philip Morris USA
Bates: 2054967295/2054967308
Date: February 1995
Rating:
Source: Philip Morris
Page Count: 15
Type: Speech, presentation, etc
Summary: Confidential records administration presentation identifying R&D records management for staff in Richmond, FTR personnel in Neutchatel and Philip Morris USA.

A slide notes "document disposal - shredding" but there is no context to the frequency.
View File